Estimates for a subclass of starlike functions involving a exponential function
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this paper, a new class of analytic function is defined by using an analytic characterization which is influenced by the multiplicative derivative. Multiplicative derivative is defined in a domain which excludes zero, so here the defined subclass did not involve swapping the ordinary derivative with a multiplicative derivative. But we have just used the motivation behind the purpose of such a restrictive calculus, given the circumstances that we have a more versatile calculus of Newton and Euler. Estimates involving the initial coefficients, inclusion and closure properties, which belong to the defined function class are our main results.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
References
[1] E. A. Adegani, N. E. Cho, and M. Jafari, Logarithmic coefficients for univalent functions defined by subordination, Mathematics 7 (5) (2019), 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7050408 Google Scholar
[2] E. A. Adegani, T. Bulboacă, N. H. Mohammed, and P. Zaprawa, Solution of logarithmic coefficients conjectures for some classes of convex functions, Mathematica Slovaca 73 (1) (2023), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1515/ms-2023-0009 Google Scholar
[3] D. Alimohammadi, N. E. Cho, E. A. Adegani, and A. Motamednezhad, Argument and coefficient estimates for certain analytic functions, Mathematics 8 (1) (2020), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010088 Google Scholar
[4] D. Alimohammadi, E. A. Adegani, T. Bulboacă, and N. E. Cho, Logarithmic coefficients for classes related to convex functions, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 44 (2021), 2659–2673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-021-01085-z Google Scholar
[5] S. Altinkaya and S. Yalçın, On some subclasses of M-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions, Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. Sér. A1 Math. Stat. 67 (1) (2018), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1501/Commua1_0000000827 Google Scholar
[6] J. H. Arango, D. Mejía, and S. Ruscheweyh, Exponentially convex univalent functions, Complex Variables Theory Appl. 33 (1-4) (1997), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476939708815010 Google Scholar
[7] A. E. Bashirov, E. M. Kurpinar, and A. Özyapıcı, Multiplicative calculus and its applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 337 (1) (2008), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.03.081 Google Scholar
[8] A. E. Bashirov, E. Mısırlı, Y. Tandogdu, and A. Özyapıcı, On modeling with multiplicative differential equations, Appl. Math. J. Chin. Univ. 26 (2011), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-011-2767-6 Google Scholar
[9] A. E. Bashirov and M. Riza, On complex multiplicative differentiation, TWMS J. Appl. Eng. Math. 1 (1) (2011), 75–85. Google Scholar
[10] D. Breaz, K. R. Karthikeyan, and E. Umadevi, Non-Carathéodory analytic functions with respect to symmetric points, Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. 30 (1) (2024), 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13873954.2024.2341691 Google Scholar
[11] D. Breaz, K. R. Karthikeyan, and G. Murugusundaramoorthy, Applications of Mittag–Leffler functions on a subclass of meromorphic functions influenced by the definition of a non-Newtonian derivative, Fractal Fract. 8 (2024), 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8090509 Google Scholar
[12] D. Breaz, K. R. Karthikeyan, D. Mohankumar, and A. Senguttuvan, Properties of a subclass of starlike functions involving the quantum derivative operator, MethodsX 15 (2025), 103740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103740 Google Scholar
[13] C. Carathéodory, Über den Variabilitätsbereich der Koeffizienten von Potenzreihen, Math. Ann. 64 (1) (1907), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01449883 Google Scholar
[14] I. Efraimidis, A generalization of Livingston’s coefficient inequalities for functions with positive real part, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 435 (1) (2016), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.10.050 Google Scholar
[15] R. W. Ibrahim and M. Darus, Subordination inequalities of a new Salagean-difference operator, Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 14 (3) (2019), 573–582. https://future-in-tech.net/14.3/R-RabhaIbrahim.pdf Google Scholar
[16] R. W. Ibrahim, On a Janowski formula based on a generalized differential operator, Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. Ser. A1 Math. Stat. 69 (2) (2020), 1320–1328. Google Scholar
[17] K. R. Karthikeyan and G. Murugusundaramoorthy, Properties of a class of analytic functions influenced by multiplicative calculus, Fractal Fract. 8 (3) (2024), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8030131 Google Scholar
[18] Z. Lewandowski, S. S. Miller, and E. Zlotkiewicz, Gamma-starlike functions, Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Sect. A 28 (1974), 53–58. Google Scholar
[19] A. E. Livingston, The coefficients of multivalent close-to-convex functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (1969), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.2307/2036417 Google Scholar
[20] W. C. Ma and D. Minda, A unified treatment of some special classes of univalent functions, Proc. Conf. Complex Analysis (Tianjin, 1992), Conf. Proc. Lecture Notes Anal., I, Int. Press, Cambridge, MA (1992), 157–169. Google Scholar
[21] I. M. Milin, Univalent functions and orthonormal systems, Nauka, Moscow (1971); English translation: American Mathematical Society, Providence (1977). Google Scholar
[22] C. Murat, K. R. Karthikeyan, and G. Murugusundaramoorthy, Inequalities on a class of analytic functions defined by generalized Mittag-Leffler function, Filomat 37 (19) (2023), 6277–6288. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL2319277C Google Scholar
[23] C. Pommerenke, Univalent functions, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen (1975). Google Scholar
[24] M. Riza, A. Özyapici, and E. Mısırlı, Multiplicative finite difference methods, Quart. Appl. Math. 67 (4) (2009), 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0033-569X-09-01158-2 Google Scholar
[25] H. M. Srivastava, A survey of some recent developments on higher transcendental functions of analytic number theory and applied mathematics, Symmetry 13 (2021), 2294. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13122294 Google Scholar
[26] H. M. Srivastava, An introductory overview of fractional-calculus operators based upon the Fox Wright and related higher transcendental functions, J. Adv. Engrg. Comput. 5 (3) (2021), 135–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.55579/jaec.202153.340 Google Scholar
[27] H. M. Srivastava, Some parametric and argument variations of the operators of fractional calculus and related special functions and integral transformations, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 22 (8) (2021), 1501–1520. Google Scholar
[28] H. M. Srivastava, A. Kumar, S. Das, and K. Mehrez, Geometric properties of a certain class of Mittag–Leffler-type functions, Fractal Fract. 6 (2022), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6020054 Google Scholar
[29] H. M. Srivastava, A. Fernandez, and D. Baleanu, Some new fractional-calculus connections between Mittag–Leffler functions, Mathematics 7 (2019), 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7060485 Google Scholar
[30] H. M. Srivastava, M. Bansal, and P. Harjule, A study of fractional integral operators involving a certain generalized multi-index Mittag-Leffler function, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 41 (16) (2018), 6108–6121. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.5122 Google Scholar
[31] H. M. Srivastava and Z. Tomovski, Fractional calculus with an integral operator containing a generalized Mittag-Leffler function in the kernel, Appl. Math. Comput. 211 (1) (2009), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.055 Google Scholar
[32] H. M. Srivastava, On an extension of the Mittag-Leffler function, Yokohama Math. J. 16 (1968), 77–88. Google Scholar
[33] S. S. Varma, T. Rosy, and U. Vadivelan, Radius of exponential convexity of certain subclass of analytic functions, Creat. Math. Inform. 29 (1) (2020), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.37193/CMI.2020.01.13 Google Scholar
[34] E. Umadevi and K. R. Karthikeyan, A Subclass of Close-to-Convex Function Involving Srivastava-Tomovski Operator, Recent Developments in Algebra and Analysis, ICRDM 2022, Trends in Mathematics, Birkhäuser, Cham (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37538-5_25 Google Scholar